Play Video

Course - Change Management: Closing the Plan

Course - Change Management: Closing the Plan

Posted by Kevin Miller

Released: May 20, 2022

Full Course: View on Pluralsight

Most change efforts in organizations tend to fade off into the sunset, leaving a team without any real closure and management a little uneasy, because they don’t really know for sure if the outcome was worth the effort. In this course, Change Management: Closing the Plan, you’ll learn why you should properly close out a change effort and how to effectively do so. First, you’ll explore how to evaluate the outcome of the change against the original objectives. Next, you’ll discover how to evaluate the lessons learned from the change, which you can then use to improve your entire change management practice in the future. Finally, you'll learn how to properly go about obtaining sponsor approval to close out the change effort. When you’re finished with this course, you’ll have the skills and knowledge necessary to properly close a change effort, and be prepared for this section of the CCMP exam.

Free Clips

Free Clips

Introduction to Closing the Plan

Introduction to Closing the Plan

Properly closing out a change is a critical, yet often ignored, step. It's easy for those tactically leading the change to want to skip this step so they can focus their time and efforts on something more urgent, and it's easy for those strategically leading the change to quite simply forget about following through with its proper closure, especially if things are going well. But closing the plan should be viewed with as much importance as every other aspect of change management.

In addition to providing everyone with a sense of closure, it ensures the desired outcomes were either met or there are plans in place to ensure they will be met in the near future. It also formally signals when the project team rolls off, and they transition the ongoing maintenance of the change to the operations team. Finally, it provides the organization and each individual involved with the change with an opportunity to grow by looking back and reflecting on what went well and what could be improved upon next time.

When a change is not properly closed, there is a sense of unease among the project team, since no one really knows when they're done. The desired outcomes, the whole point of the change, may not be delivered, and without a plan to get them delivered in the near future, the change and everyone involved will be viewed as a failure. What do you suppose that does to morale when future changes are announced? Without a formal transition from the project team to operations, you end up with a lot of tension between the two groups of people as one group is trying to get something off of their plates, but the other group is trying to keep something from coming onto their already overloaded plates, and of course the individuals involved and the organization as a whole become stagnant. Things that were done well may be forgotten, and mistakes from the past will haunt projects in the future.

Play Video
Play Video

Transferring Ownership and Releasing Resources

Transferring Ownership and Releasing Resources

Transferring ownership and releasing resources are two of the foreclosure conditions that need to be met to gain approval for completion.

The ownership of all change outcomes, including processes, technology, organizations, and other outcomes, must be transferred from change resources to stakeholder operational resources. This means the responsibility of keeping things running, up-to-date, and accurate falls on a person or group who is not part of implementing the change. And all of this should be evidenced by a written agreement between both parties. I personally like the operational group to physically sign the document in some sort of formal ceremony, such as a release party or even at the end of the lesson's learned meeting. Signing a document in front of a large group signifies progress, commitment, and ownership. In addition, you'll want them to sign because it's very difficult for someone to say afterward that they weren't ready or were not properly prepared by the group who implemented the change.

Included in the document should be the scope of what is being transitioned. For example, if a new software application has five modules, but only the first three are live and in production while the other two are still being developed, only those first three should be transitioned, and that should be clear in the document. Knowledge transfer should also be included. Notice how I said transferred, as in the past tense? This document signifies the transition of responsibility, which means all the prep work to make the transition possible should already be done. You want to write down all the knowledge that was transferred via face-to-face meetings and the location of all relevant documentation. If something was mistakenly left out of the knowledge transfer, the implementing team should be expected to assist if called upon.

Finally, all change resources should be released and made available for use in other change efforts. There are a few ways to do this, and in the next clip, I'll show you my preferred way of releasing resources.

The template I'm going to show you is the final summary report, which is used for closing the change initiative.

Here is the Final Summary Report template. You'll notice three tabs at the bottom of this spreadsheet. The first tab is for the first two closure conditions, Scope and Lessons Learned. The second tab is for the third closure condition, Transfer of Ownership. The third tab is for the fourth closure condition, Release of Resources. You'll find space for the change and project name, as well as the approval date and the names of the approvers. If you need more space for the approvers, feel free to add that in. Right below that, you'll find a table for the first closure condition, the Scope of the change/project. Here, you should list out all of the objectives and whether they were met or not. Again, if you need to add more rows, feel free to do that. Below the table is an area for Closure Condition #2, Lessons Learned. Here, you just have three questions. First, was a lessons learned meeting conducted, yes or no? The answer to this question should always be yes. If the answer is no, you really shouldn't be looking to close this change just yet. Was the lessons learned evaluation shared with others? If your organization has a PMO or a CMO, you should absolutely share the lessons learned evaluation with those groups. If your organization does not have one of those groups, you at least want to share it with your manager and other people who perform your role. And finally, the location of the lessons learned evaluation, whether that be on some network drive or in a knowledge database. The last section of this tab is for the signatures. In a previous clip, I mentioned the importance of getting a physical signature for the closure of a change or project. You may elect not to use this, but if you do, there is a space built right into this report for those signatures.

Let's move over to the Transfer of Ownership tab, where you'll be able to document Closure Condition #3. Again, you should add as many rows as needed. The information you want to capture on this table is the transition items, the knowledge transferred for those transition items, who it's being transferred from, who it's being transferred to, and the signature of the person it's being transferred to. Let's review a couple of the examples I've included. The first example of a transition item is the help desk ticket escalation process. The accountability of this process is moving from John Smith to Sally Jones. And the knowledge transferred from John to Sally included the help desk ticket escalation flow chart. You'll notice I included the location of that flow chart, as well as exactly when John reviewed it with Sally. In the last column, we have a space for Sally's signature should you choose to print this form and obtain it. The second example is for the communication of weekly statistics. Sandy Jenkins is currently accountable for this but is transferring it to Tommaso Bertolino. While there wasn't a personal handoff on this one, Sandy has notated where the communication style guide resides, as well as all of the historical communications. Tommaso should only sign if those files meet his needs for a knowledge transfer.

The final tab is for Closure Condition #4, Release of Resources. In the table, you should record each resource's name and their role. I provided two examples: John Smith, a change analyst, and Sandy Jenkins, the communication lead. You'll notice we have two additional columns: Release Date and Release Conditions. The instructions above the table explain a release date should be used when a resource is already committed to a new change of project. I personally like to use release conditions, and you can see an example of one here. Just because a resource is being released, that doesn't mean the person has to be released 100% at the same time. Here is an example of two conditions. The first is to reduce John's commitment to 50% on September 1st of 2022. The second release condition is to release him from this change or project completely once all of the documentation is updated in the knowledge base system. If all four closure conditions are met, your approver should have no problem signing this document. As I mentioned before, I recommend you get physical signatures.